Philosophy – like physics – is complex.
So when a simple idea can penetrate the cloud of jargon and analysis, it spreads liked a planned pandemic.
In physics, things like The Big Bang and E = mc^2 escaped the cloistered halls of academia and caught on. Most folks who can tell you what E famously equals can’t tell you what that equation means, but that’s okay. It’s a lot simpler and catchier than, say, the Maxwell equations.
Similar things happen with philosophy. A classic example is Descartes’ ol’ expression:
I think, therefore I am.
It’s simple enough to remember. It’s also simple enough to understand. Unlike with Einstein’s famous equation, I think most folks get what ITTIA suggests:
You might not be sure of much.
The world might be a big bundle of lies and illusions that we misinterpret.
But at least, even if you know nothing else, you know that you exist. If you didn’t exist, there’d be no one there to wonder about it.
It’s a simple idea, so easy to understand.
And what a shame that is, given how wrong it is – and how bad it is for you.
How is it wrong? Surely something as simple as ITTIA is self-evident? No, because how do you know that you exist? I think is proof that something exists, but that something might not be you. The thing that thinks it’s you might be a drug-addled monkey’s hallucinations, garbage output from a galactic supercomputer or a swarm of particles sparking off each other at random.
I exist is an assumption – and a reasonable one.
But you can’t question everything else but leave that standing. It’s a ridiculous oversight.
Now, how it’s bad for you:
The four pillars of philosophy are logic (how consistent and coherent ideas are), epistemology (how we know what we know), ethics (what is good and what is bad) and aesthetics (what’s beautiful, appealing and desirable).
As an Anglican preacher pointed out to me recently, ITTIA eliminates the pillar of aesthetics. If nothing outside of you is real, then beauty is entirely subjective. People see beauty in things that are almost but not perfectly symmetric (think of Marilyn Monroe’s mole, which only made her more beautiful) – it’s culturally universal, hardwired into the human brain – but, hey, maybe that’s just, like, an opinion, man.
Beauty has objective rules. That’s what aesthetics studies. But
The preacher didn’t go far enough. ITTIA undermines epistemology, because how can we know what we know when we can’t trust anything but our own thoughts? It certainly undermines ethics. Good and bad lose their meaning when you can’t even be sure that other people are even real.
At least ITTIA doesn’t necessarily undermine logic. It just fails the logical tests of coherency and consistency, but it doesn’t destroy logic itself.
But that’s still three out of four pillars of philosophy cast into the dirt.
If you’re wondering why the modern West is so insane at times, this is a big part of part of it.
Aesthetic relativity is how a fat woman with a shaved head, permanent scowl and neck tattoos can look you in the eye and tell you she’s beautiful – no, she’s perfect.
It’s how a billion-dollar company can build a new HQ so hideous it makes your eyes bleed, while poor and illiterate peasants used to make even their post offices gorgeous and timeless.
It’s why so much art these days is about sensory pleasure – think action movies, romcoms and simple dramas – whereas art used to be a spiritual connection to something transcendent and sublime.
Compare modern sculptures to medieval ones and you’ll see we’ve lost something special.
And that’s just aesthetic relativism.
Moral relativism is how you decide you can exploit the vulnerable, treat the dying as burdens, kill your own baby, call yourself whatever gender you want and destroy the natural environment, so long as it makes you happy. Truth, beauty and society be damned – all that matters is how you feel. Everything else is secondary. Of course that all is – after all, those other things might not even exist, so why sweat it?
It’s pure selfishness, to the point of writing off everything else as worse than irrelevant.
Given the choice between creating a legacy and mindlessly consuming, only a moral relativist would get that wrong.
“Are you blaming Descartes for problems that didn’t appear until centuries after his death?”
I surely am – and with good reason. People might have echoes and parroted ITTIA to each other, but society was still Christian at heart. They might have said the words, they might have even intellectually agreed with them but – at their spiritual and emotional core, which held onto Christian values – they collectively rejected Descartes.
Christianity teaches you that not only is the world real, it (and the people living here) matter so much that God was willing to live as a human, suffer every mortal indignity and then die a painful death to save us.
The world doesn’t just exist in the Christian viewpoint – it’s incredibly precious. God sacrificed Himself to protect it.
Believe that, hold that in your heart, and ITTIA becomes just a bunch of words.
But they’re sticky words. They’re easy to remember, repeat and understand, even if you don’t fully live by them.
That means they stuck around, dormant, like a virus suppressed by a healthy immune system.
All it took for that vile philosophy to rise was for the West to turn its back on Christianity. Treat the Bible as a bunch of obsolete fairy tales from bigoted shepherds and suddenly everything it protected you from comes back.
Without Christian values to protect society, we’re sick – and vulnerable to whatever viruses lie within our minds.
But this isn’t me preaching.
This isn’t me telling you to convert to Christianity.
(Although now that I mention it, that’s a great idea.)
No, you don’t need to be a Christian to enjoy Christian values. Every generation has had its radicals, heretics, foreigners, doubters, contrarians and the overly pragmatic. It doesn’t matter – when society overall has Christian values, you can share those values even if you don’t share the faith that supports them.
That, essentially, is what Your Story Isn’t About You teaches.
Even that name is a wholesome inversion of ITTIA – a reminder to think of others more than you think of yourself.
And to think like them, too.
Not to mindlessly mimic those around you, but to understand them. In fact, you’ll be truer to yourself when you really get how and why folks disagree with you.
And it’s not about martyrdom, denying your own desires or experiences to appease others. In fact, you’ll get a lot more of what you want in life if you understand how others think. Dating, sales, friendship, marriage, community – all of the important things come from understanding other people, whether you agree with them or not.
Your Story Isn’t About You, but that doesn’t mean you can’t enjoy it.
Whether you’re Christian or not – even if you’re a full-blown militant atheist – you’ll get a lot out of reading, rereading and applying this.
Download it from the signature block of my emails, or read more about it here:
https://christianhypnotism.com/ysiay
You must be logged in to post a comment.