Suppose there’s a Button.
If you press it, you die. Game over.
But to sweeten the deal, pushing it makes one change of your choosing to the world.
What you do with the Button says a lot about who you are.
If you choose not to push it, then you’re weak. Is there no hypothetical situation you’d be willing to give your life? Really?
But it’s worth putting some thought into this. A bad choice could have unintended consequences – if you wish to eliminate hatred, then no one will stand against injustice. If you solve global warming, then you’ve thought too small – and you’ll see that when the nukes fly. Spread the wealth equally and it will disperse itself again in a few years.
What would I choose?
I’d give my life to eliminate Failures of Sentience. Why? How’s this for a sentiment:
I don’t agree with you, but I can see how you’ve come to believe that. Now let’s find common ground and solve our common problems together.
If that were how we all genuinely approached each other, most of our problems would have a half-life measured in months.
Most utopias are bull manure because they don’t allow for human nature. My vision here – universal sentience – does. Greed, ego, even psychopathy can still exist in a world without Failures of Sentience, but they don’t stop the utopia.
It’s not hard to understand other people when you shut up, listen, get curious and use a little imagination.
Young children are capable of all those skills. When did we all forget them?
Use your birthright as a human – the ability to see things from the eyes of others – and you’ll realise how much you and your so-called enemies have in common.
In the US, Democrats and Republicans are cooking up a sequel to their civil war despite agreeing on the majority of issues. Their disagreements are important and worth debating, but they’re not worth killing or cancelling each other over them.
They’d get a lot done if they figured out how to talk – and how to listen.
I used to be staunchly liberal. Then I started dabbling in early versions of the principles I cover in the Sentience Seminar. Now, my politics are based on solid principles, swinging left, right, up and down based on what’s best, instead of blindly leaning one way.
(“Yeah? Well, my politics are based on solid principles too – common sense and compassion – so I’m always liberal/conservative/whatever.” Oh, please. Common sense is a myth. As for compassion, plenty of compassionate folks disagree with you. You’d know that if you listened without looking for points to score.)
And I cringe when I hear political fanatics screaming at each other like children. Since there’s logic behind both views, it means they’re both wrong to fling muck like this.
Some policies lead to better outcomes than others, sure, so it sure would be nice to engage on that level. You know, in good faith. Like adults.
You know the weird thing?
When you listen and folks feel safe enough to open up, you’ll find their beliefs make a lot of sense. They’re always more complicated than you’re racist!!! or you’re brainwashed!!!
Always.
It took me a while to get used to that.
Maybe you’ll find it smoother when you apply what you learn from the Sentience Seminar. Maybe you’ll find it humbling, just as I did. Either way, it’s your duty as a citizen to understand all common beliefs, ideas and philosophies.
It pays well, too, figuring out what folks really think.
It’s not often you learn a practical skill that can also help heal the wounded psyche of the world, but that’s sentience for you.
Register for the seminar here:
antipater.page/sentience
You must be logged in to post a comment.